
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon HD 8990

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank #15 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8990 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8990.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design and Radeon HD 8990

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

Radeon HD 8990
The Radeon HD 8990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,214 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 5,310 and the Radeon HD 8990 reaches 5,214 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 8990 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 8990). Raw compute: 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 8990). Boost clocks: 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,310+2% | 5,214 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2048 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.177 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+88% |
| Boost Clock | 1417 MHz+42% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 48 | 128 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 512 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8990 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8990) — a 2473.2% advantage for the Radeon HD 8990. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 8990) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 288 GB/s x2+157% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit x2+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8990's 375W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 750W (Radeon HD 8990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-80% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.8+409% | 13.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design | Radeon HD 8990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $999 |
| Codename | GP107 | Malta |
| Release | January 3 2018 | April 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #429 | #412 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















