
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1154.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 375W, a 255W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1104.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 375W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
2017GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1154.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 375W, a 255W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅140% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 5 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1104.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 375W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 5GB better than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN Z still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 297 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 99 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 5GB and GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
GeForce GTX 1060 5GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 26 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,175 points.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB scores 9,175 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Z reaches 8,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Raw compute: 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Boost clocks: 1709 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,175+4% | 8,811 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 5760 ×2+350% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.375 TFLOPS | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2+15% |
| Boost Clock | 1709 MHz+95% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 40 | 48 ×2+20% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240 ×2+200% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+100% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 1.5 MB+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB comes with 5 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 140% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — a 2001.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 160-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 5 GB | 12 GB+140% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 336 GB/s x2+110% |
| Bus Width | 160-bit | 384-bit x2+140% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 1.5 MB+20% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Z's 375W — a 103% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 250mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-68% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-43% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 250mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.5+226% | 23.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB costs 91.7% less ($2750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (GeForce GTX 1060 5GB) vs 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) — the GeForce GTX 1060 5GB offers 1169% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 5GB is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 5GB | GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-92% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8+1169% | 2.9 |
| Codename | GP106 | GK110B |
| Release | December 26 2017 | May 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #289 | #300 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













