GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is positioned at rank #12 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 353.2% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel).
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-353.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+353.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 15 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1380 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) scores 6,968 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 353.2%. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 3.195 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,968 | 31,578+353% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 7680+650% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.195 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+1155% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 2610 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 7.5 MB+650% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 293.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 504 GB/s+294% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 140.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-82% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-50% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 285mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 139.4+26% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $590 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD104 |
| Release | April 15 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #352 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
