GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
Tesla M60
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) vs Tesla M60 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) vs Tesla M60 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) vs Tesla M60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Tesla M60 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 300W, a 250W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 300W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) vs Tesla M60 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 15 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1380 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) scores 6,968 and the Tesla M60 reaches 7,002 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 3.195 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,968 | 7,002 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.195 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2+51% |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz+32% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M60 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) and 256-bit on the Tesla M60. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Tesla M60) — the Tesla M60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-83% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 139.4+498% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3000 |
| Codename | TU117 | GM204 |
| Release | April 15 2020 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #352 | #355 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) and Tesla M60
