GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) vs Radeon Pro 5300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) vs Radeon Pro 5300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) vs Radeon Pro 5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

2020

Why buy it

✅27.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 5300

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 5300 instead at 7,125 vs 6,968, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 5300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) vs Radeon Pro 5300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 15 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1380 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

Radeon Pro 5300

The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) scores 6,968 and the Radeon Pro 5300 reaches 7,125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300). Raw compute: 3.195 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1650 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)	Radeon Pro 5300
G3D Mark Score	6,968	7,125+2%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1024	1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.195 TFLOPS	4.224 TFLOPS+32%
Boost Clock	1560 MHz	1650 MHz+6%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)	Radeon Pro 5300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5300. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300) — the Radeon Pro 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)	Radeon Pro 5300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)	Radeon Pro 5300
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)	Radeon Pro 5300
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (4th Gen)	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.