GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 460M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 460M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 460M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 260
2008Why buy it
- ✅46.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 896 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 896 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌264% higher power demand at 182W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 460M
2010Why buy it
- ✅71.4% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 896 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 182W, a 132W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 260 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 260 vs GeForce GTX 460M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 260
The GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points. Launch price was $449.

GeForce GTX 460M
The GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,218 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 260 scores 1,200 and the GeForce GTX 460M reaches 1,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 460M uses Fermi, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 260) vs 192 (GeForce GTX 460M). Raw compute: 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260) vs 0.5184 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | GeForce GTX 460M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,200 | 1,218+2% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4769 TFLOPS | 0.5184 TFLOPS+9% |
| ROPs | 28+17% | 24 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 384 KB+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | GeForce GTX 460M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 260 has 896 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 460M gives you 71.4% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 260 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460M. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 260) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460M) — the GeForce GTX 460M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | GeForce GTX 460M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.875 GB | 1.5 GB+71% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 384 KB+71% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10_0 (GeForce GTX 260) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | GeForce GTX 460M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10_0 | 12 (11_0)+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 260) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460M). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 260) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | GeForce GTX 460M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 260 draws 182W versus the GeForce GTX 460M's 50W — a 113.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 460M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 260) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 460M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | GeForce GTX 460M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 182W | 50W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.6 | 24.4+270% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 460M (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | GeForce GTX 460M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | — |
| Codename | GT200 | GF106 |
| Release | June 16 2008 | September 3 2010 |
| Ranking | #821 | #814 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















