CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 260
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 5800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 260 is positioned at rank 293 and the Quadro FX 5800 is on rank 392, so the GeForce GTX 260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 5800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 5800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 357.1% more VRAM (4 GB vs 896 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 260.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 260 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+357.1%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 5800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 5800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $449), it costs 91% less, resulting in a 1032.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 260 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1032.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($449) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro FX 5800
GeForce GTX 260
The GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points. Launch price was $449.
Quadro FX 5800
The Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,211 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 260 scores 1,200 and the Quadro FX 5800 reaches 1,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 5800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 65 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 260) vs 240 (Quadro FX 5800). Raw compute: 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 5800).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,200 | 1,211 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 240+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4769 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS+30% |
| ROPs | 28 | 32+14% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 260 comes with 896 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 5800 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 5800 offers 357.1% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 260) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 5800) — the Quadro FX 5800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.875 GB | 4 GB+357% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 260 draws 182W versus the Quadro FX 5800's 189W — a 3.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 260) vs 350W (Quadro FX 5800). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 182W-4% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.6+3% | 6.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 260 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $449, while the Quadro FX 5800 launched at $3499 and now averages $40. The Quadro FX 5800 costs 91.1% less ($409 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (GeForce GTX 260) vs 30.3 (Quadro FX 5800) — the Quadro FX 5800 offers 1022.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260 | Quadro FX 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449-87% | $3499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $449 | $40-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 30.3+1022% |
| Codename | GT200 | GT200B |
| Release | June 16 2008 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #821 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 260 and Quadro FX 5800
