GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260

2008Core: 576 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 260

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (896 MB vs Unknown).
  • Intel UHD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 260 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 896 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1113.3% higher power demand at 182W vs 15W.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 182W, a 167W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 896 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (1,231 vs 1,200), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 260 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 896 MB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 260 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Intel UHD Graphics 630 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260

The GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points. Launch price was $449.

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 630

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,231 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 260 scores 1,200 and the Intel UHD Graphics 630 reaches 1,231 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 65 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 260) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Raw compute: 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 630).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260Intel UHD Graphics 630
G3D Mark Score
1,200
1,231+3%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Generation 9.5
Process Node
65 nm
14 nm+++
Shading Units
192+4%
184
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4769 TFLOPS+13%
0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPs
28+833%
3
TMUs
64+178%
23

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 260 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260Intel UHD Graphics 630
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 260 has 896 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 260 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 260 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 630.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260Intel UHD Graphics 630
VRAM Capacity
0.875 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 260 draws 182W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 630's 15W — a 169.5% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 260) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 630). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260Intel UHD Graphics 630
TDP
182W
15W-92%
Recommended PSU
500W
1W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
6.6
82.1+1144%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 260 came in at $449, while the Intel UHD Graphics 630 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 630 was 100+% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.7 (GeForce GTX 260) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 630) — the Intel UHD Graphics 630 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSRP
$449
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.7
Infinity
Codename
GT200
Comet Lake GT2
Release
June 16 2008
October 1 2017
Ranking
#821
#824

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.