GeForce GTX 260M vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 260M vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 260M vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 260M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌142.7% higher power demand at 182W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅793.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅GeForce GTX 260M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 182W, a 107W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 793.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1959.9% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 382), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 65nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 260M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 260M

The GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $449.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 260M scores 382 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1959.9%. The GeForce GTX 260M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 65 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	382	7,869+1960%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Turing
Process Node	65 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	192	896+367%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4769 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+526%
ROPs	28	32+14%
TMUs	64+14%	56
L2 Cache	0.22 MB	1 MB+355%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 260M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 260M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.22 MB (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.22 MB	1 MB+355%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12+8%
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP2	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 260M draws 182W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 83.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: None vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	182W	75W-59%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	None	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	2.1	104.9+4895%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GTX 260M	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	—	$149
Codename	GT200	TU117
Release	June 16 2008	April 23 2019
Ranking	#821	#323

Search GeForce GTX 260M on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.