
GeForce GTX 260M

Mobility Radeon HD 4650
GeForce GTX 260M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 260M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 260M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 260M
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌264% higher power demand at 182W vs 50W.
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 182W, a 132W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 260M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 260M
The GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $449.

Mobility Radeon HD 4650
The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 401 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 260M scores 382 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4650's 401 — the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 leads by 5%. The GeForce GTX 260M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 uses TeraScale 2, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Raw compute: 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4650).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 382 | 401+5% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4769 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS+135% |
| ROPs | 28+75% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 260M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 260M and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 4650. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 4650) — the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+10% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTX 260M) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 260M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 4650).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 260M draws 182W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4650's 50W — a 113.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4650). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 182W | 50W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1 | 8.0+281% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Mobility Radeon HD 4650 (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $49 |
| Codename | GT200 | Broadway |
| Release | June 16 2008 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #821 | #846 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














