GeForce GTX 260M vs Radeon HD 6550D

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M

2008Core: 576 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6550D

2010Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 260M vs Radeon HD 6550D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 260M vs Radeon HD 6550D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 260M vs Radeon HD 6550D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 260M

2008

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6550D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6550D

2010

Why buy it

  • 15.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6550D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.7% in PassMark G3D (400 vs 382), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 260M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6550D makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6550D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 260M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 260M vs Radeon HD 6550D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 260M

The GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $449.

AMD

Radeon HD 6550D

The Radeon HD 6550D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 400 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 260M scores 382 and the Radeon HD 6550D reaches 400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6550D uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6550D). Raw compute: 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550D).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260MRadeon HD 6550D
G3D Mark Score
382
400+5%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
65 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
1408+633%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4769 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS+372%
ROPs
28
32+14%
TMUs
64
88+38%
L2 Cache
224 KB
512 KB+129%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 260M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6550D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260MRadeon HD 6550D
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 260M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6550D carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 260M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 260M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6550D. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6550D) — the Radeon HD 6550D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260MRadeon HD 6550D
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
224 KB
512 KB+129%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 260M draws 182W versus the Radeon HD 6550D's 200W — a 9.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 260M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6550D). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 260MRadeon HD 6550D
TDP
182W-9%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
2.1+5%
2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6550D (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 260MRadeon HD 6550D
MSRP
$70
Codename
GT200
Cayman
Release
June 16 2008
December 14 2010
Ranking
#821
#623

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.