CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 260M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6550D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 260M is positioned at rank 134 and the Radeon HD 6550D is on rank 207, so the GeForce GTX 260M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 260M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6550D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6550D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 260M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 260M | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6550D remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 260M and Radeon HD 6550D
GeForce GTX 260M
The GeForce GTX 260M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 16 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 576 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 182W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $449.
Radeon HD 6550D
The Radeon HD 6550D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 400 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 260M scores 382 and the Radeon HD 6550D reaches 400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 260M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6550D uses TeraScale 3, both on 65 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6550D). Raw compute: 0.4769 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550D).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 382 | 400+5% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 1408+633% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4769 TFLOPS | 2.253 TFLOPS+372% |
| ROPs | 28 | 32+14% |
| TMUs | 64 | 88+38% |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 512 KB+129% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 260M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6550D has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 260M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6550D) — the Radeon HD 6550D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 512 KB+129% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 260M draws 182W versus the Radeon HD 6550D's 200W — a 9.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 260M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 260M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6550D). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 182W-9% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6550D is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 260M | Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $70 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $70 |
| Codename | GT200 | Cayman |
| Release | June 16 2008 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #821 | #623 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 260M and Radeon HD 6550D
