GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
  • Measures 210mm instead of 240mm, a 30mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Older hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • 320.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
  • 14.3% longer card at 240mm vs 210mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 320.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 371.9% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 4,800), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 460 768MB is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of Unknown node, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 460 768MB scores 4,800 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 371.9%. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
4,800
22,651+372%
Architecture
Fermi
Ada Lovelace
Shading Units
336
4352+1195%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 460 768MB is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 233.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 768MB and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
8 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
288 GB/s+233%
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 210mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 460 768MBGeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP
75W-53%
160W
Recommended PSU
450W-18%
550W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
8-pin
Length
210mm
240mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70°C
Perf/Watt
64.0
141.6+121%