GeForce GTX 470M vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470M

2010Core: 535 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 470M vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 470M vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 470M

2010

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Iris Xe MAX Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 470M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

2020

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,972 vs 1,953), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 470M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Xe MAX Graphics makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Iris Xe MAX Graphics is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 470M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 470M vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470M

The GeForce GTX 470M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,953 points.

Intel

Iris Xe MAX Graphics

The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 470M scores 1,953 and the Iris Xe MAX Graphics reaches 1,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470M is built on Fermi while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics uses Generation 12.1, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Raw compute: 0.6163 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MIris Xe MAX Graphics
G3D Mark Score
1,953
1,972
Architecture
Fermi
Generation 12.1
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
288
768+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6163 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS+311%
ROPs
24
24
TMUs
48
48
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 470M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MIris Xe MAX Graphics
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 470M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 470M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470M and System on the Iris Xe MAX Graphics. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MIris Xe MAX Graphics
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MIris Xe MAX Graphics
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.1
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 470M) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 470M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MIris Xe MAX Graphics
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP4
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 470M draws 75W versus the Iris Xe MAX Graphics's 25W — a 100% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MIris Xe MAX Graphics
TDP
75W
25W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80-6%
Perf/Watt
26.0
78.9+203%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Iris Xe MAX Graphics (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MIris Xe MAX Graphics
MSRP
$55
Codename
GF104
DG1
Release
September 3 2010
October 31 2020
Ranking
#689
#686

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.