
GeForce GTX 470M

Radeon R9 M385X
GeForce GTX 470M vs Radeon R9 M385X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 470M vs Radeon R9 M385X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 470M vs Radeon R9 M385X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 470M
2010Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M385X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M385X
2015Why buy it
- ✅34.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 470M vs Radeon R9 M385X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 470M
The GeForce GTX 470M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,953 points.

Radeon R9 M385X
The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 470M scores 1,953 and the Radeon R9 M385X reaches 1,994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M385X uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385X). Raw compute: 0.6163 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,953 | 1,994+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 896+211% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6163 TFLOPS | 1.971 TFLOPS+220% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+71% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 470M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M385X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 470M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385X carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 470M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385X. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385X) — the GeForce GTX 470M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1.5 GB+200% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M385X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 470M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M385X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 470M) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M385X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 470M draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M385X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 26.6+2% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R9 M385X (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 470M | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GF104 | Strato |
| Release | September 3 2010 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #689 | #681 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















