GeForce GTX 470M vs RadeonT RX Vega 11

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470M

2010Core: 535 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RadeonT RX Vega 11

2018Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1251 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 470M vs RadeonT RX Vega 11 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 470M vs RadeonT RX Vega 11 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 470M vs RadeonT RX Vega 11: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 470M

2010

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • RadeonT RX Vega 11 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 470M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX Vega 11 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.

RadeonT RX Vega 11

2018

Why buy it

  • 13.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RadeonT RX Vega 11 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 470M instead at 1,953 vs 1,917, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 470M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RadeonT RX Vega 11 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, RadeonT RX Vega 11 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 470M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 470M vs RadeonT RX Vega 11 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 470M

The GeForce GTX 470M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,953 points.

AMD

RadeonT RX Vega 11

The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,917 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 470M scores 1,953 and the RadeonT RX Vega 11 reaches 1,917 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 470M is built on Fermi while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 704 (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Raw compute: 0.6163 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX Vega 11).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MRadeonT RX Vega 11
G3D Mark Score
1,953+2%
1,917
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 5.0
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
288
704+144%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6163 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+186%
ROPs
24+200%
8
TMUs
48+9%
44

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 470M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MRadeonT RX Vega 11
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 470M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 470M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470M and 64-bit on the RadeonT RX Vega 11.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MRadeonT RX Vega 11
VRAM Capacity
1.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 470M draws 75W versus the RadeonT RX Vega 11's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 470M) vs 1W (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MRadeonT RX Vega 11
TDP
75W
35W-53%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
26.0
54.8+111%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT RX Vega 11 (2018 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTX 470MRadeonT RX Vega 11
MSRP
$0
Codename
GF104
Raven
Release
September 3 2010
May 10 2018
Ranking
#689
#673

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.