
GeForce GTX 460 SE

GeForce GTX 470M
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
2010Why buy it
- ✅39.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 470M
2010Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 SE
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

GeForce GTX 470M
The GeForce GTX 470M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 3 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 535 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,953 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 SE scores 1,988 and the GeForce GTX 470M reaches 1,953 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 470M uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 470M). Raw compute: 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 0.6163 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,988+2% | 1,953 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 288 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7488 TFLOPS+21% | 0.6163 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 470M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 470M gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 SE and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 470M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 470M) — the GeForce GTX 460 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1.5 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 470M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 470M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 470M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 SE draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 470M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 470M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 470M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | GeForce GTX 470M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 26.0+95% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














