CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Popular choices:
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 460 SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $50 for the GeForce GTX 460 SE, it costs 70% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 235.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+235.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GeForce GTX 460 SE
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 28 2019. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 64 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 SE scores 1,988 and the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is built on Fermi while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 64 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,988 | 2,000 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 288+350% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 460 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 4.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 SE draws 150W versus the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)'s 12W — a 170.4% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 210mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 12W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 210mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 166.7+1153% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 460 SE launched at $160 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) launched at $0 and now averages $15. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.8 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 133.3 (Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)) — the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) offers 234.9% better value. The Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8 | 133.3+235% |
| Codename | GF104 | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 |
| Release | November 15 2010 | May 28 2019 |
| Ranking | #683 | #672 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
