GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 350

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 460 SE

2010Core: 650 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R9 350

2015Boost: 1000 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 350 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 460 SE

1 GB 150

1,988

0.0%

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

1,998

+0.5%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
61.6% HIGHER MSRP
$160 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R9 350

2015

Why buy it

✅54.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Measures 168mm instead of 210mm, a 42mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,998 vs 1,988), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $61 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $160, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62.4% (20.2 vs 12.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 460 SE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

Radeon R9 350

The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 SE scores 1,988 and the Radeon R9 350 reaches 1,998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	Radeon R9 350
G3D Mark Score	1,988	1,998
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	288	2560+789%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7488 TFLOPS	5.12 TFLOPS+584%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	48	160+233%
L1 Cache	384 KB	640 KB+67%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	Radeon R9 350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 350 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 SE and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 350. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) — the Radeon R9 350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	Radeon R9 350
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	Radeon R9 350
DirectX	12.0	12_0
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 3.1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	Radeon R9 350
Encoder	UVD 4.0	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	UVD 3.1
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 SE draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 210mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	Radeon R9 350
TDP	150W-50%	300W
Recommended PSU	450W	300W-33%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	None
Length	210mm	168mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	13.3+99%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 SE came in at $160, while the Radeon R9 350 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R9 350 was 38.1% cheaper ($61 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) — the Radeon R9 350 offers 62.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 350 (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	Radeon R9 350
MSRP	$160	$99-38%
Performance per Dollar	12.4	20.2+63%
Codename	GF104	Grenada
Release	November 15 2010	June 18 2015
Ranking	#683	#296

Search GeForce GTX 460 SE on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.