GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Pro Graphics 580
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Pro Graphics 580 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Pro Graphics 580 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Pro Graphics 580: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Pro Graphics 580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 460 SE is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.
Iris Pro Graphics 580
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015−2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Pro Graphics 580 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.
Iris Pro Graphics 580
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 SE scores 1,988 and the Iris Pro Graphics 580 reaches 1,985 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is built on Fermi while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Raw compute: 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 580).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,988 | 1,985 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm+ |
| Shading Units | 288 | 576+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7488 TFLOPS | 1.094 TFLOPS+46% |
| ROPs | 32+256% | 9 |
| TMUs | 48 | 72+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 460 SE gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 SE and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 580.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Pro Graphics 580). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Pro Graphics 580).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 4.0 | Quick Sync Video |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | Quick Sync Video |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 SE draws 150W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 210mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 45W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 210mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 44.1+232% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 SE came in at $160, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 580 was 100+% cheaper ($160 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) — the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics 580 (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Pro Graphics 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF104 | Skylake GT4e |
| Release | November 15 2010 | September 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #683 | #707 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Pro Graphics 580
