
GeForce GTX 460 SE

Quadro 5000
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro 5000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro 5000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro 5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,339 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1481.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro 5000
2011Why buy it
- ✅8.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅150% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1461.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$160 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro 5000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 SE
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 SE scores 1,988 and the Quadro 5000 reaches 1,963 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is built on Fermi while the Quadro 5000 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 352 (Quadro 5000). Raw compute: 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,988+1% | 1,963 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 352+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7488 TFLOPS+4% | 0.7223 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 48+9% | 44 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 704 KB+83% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 640 KB+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 5000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000 carries 3 GB. Quadro 5000 gives you 150% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 SE and 64-bit on the Quadro 5000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 640 KB (Quadro 5000) — the Quadro 5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2.5 GB+150% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 640 KB+25% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 SE draws 150W versus the Quadro 5000's 152W — a 1.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 350W (Quadro 5000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-1% | 152W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3+3% | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 SE came in at $160, while the Quadro 5000 launched at $2499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 460 SE was 93.6% cheaper ($2339 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 0.8 (Quadro 5000) — the GeForce GTX 460 SE offers 1450% better value. The newer card here is Quadro 5000 (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160-94% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4+1450% | 0.8 |
| Codename | GF104 | GF100 |
| Release | November 15 2010 | February 23 2011 |
| Ranking | #683 | #687 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















