GeForce GTX 460 SE
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
2010Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Iris Xe MAX Graphics is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 460 SE is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌190.9% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$55 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- ❌500% higher power demand at 150W vs 25W.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $105 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 188.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 150W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 460 SE scores 1,988 and the Iris Xe MAX Graphics reaches 1,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is built on Fermi while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics uses Generation 12.1, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Raw compute: 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,988 | 1,972 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 768+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7488 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS+238% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 460 SE gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 SE and System on the Iris Xe MAX Graphics. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 4.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 460 SE draws 150W versus the Iris Xe MAX Graphics's 25W — a 142.9% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 210mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 25W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 210mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 78.9+493% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 460 SE came in at $160, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55. On MSRP, Iris Xe MAX Graphics was 65.6% cheaper ($105 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.4 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 35.9 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) — the Iris Xe MAX Graphics offers 189.5% better value. The newer card here is Iris Xe MAX Graphics (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 460 SE | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $160 | $55-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 35.9+190% |
| Codename | GF104 | DG1 |
| Release | November 15 2010 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #683 | #686 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 460 SE and Iris Xe MAX Graphics
