GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 765M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 765M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 765M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

2010

Why buy it

✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 765M

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $160 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 460 SE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 765M instead at 2,014 vs 1,988, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 460 SE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 765M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

GeForce GTX 765M

The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 SE scores 1,988 and the GeForce GTX 765M reaches 2,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 765M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 765M). Raw compute: 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	GeForce GTX 765M
G3D Mark Score	1,988	2,014+1%
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	288	768+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7488 TFLOPS	1.326 TFLOPS+77%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48	64+33%
L1 Cache	384 KB+500%	64 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	GeForce GTX 765M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 765M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 765M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 SE and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 765M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 765M) — the GeForce GTX 460 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	GeForce GTX 765M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	80 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 765M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	GeForce GTX 765M
DirectX	12.0	12 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 765M). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 765M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	GeForce GTX 765M
Encoder	UVD 4.0	1st Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 SE draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 765M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 765M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 765M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	GeForce GTX 765M
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	210mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	13.3	26.9+102%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 765M (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 SE	GeForce GTX 765M
MSRP	$160	—
Codename	GF104	GK106
Release	November 15 2010	May 30 2013
Ranking	#683	#680

Search GeForce GTX 460 SE on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 765M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.