
GeForce GTX 555 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375

GeForce GTX 555
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 555 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 555 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 555 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $300), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 918.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+918.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 555 and Radeon R9 M275X / M375

GeForce GTX 555
The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 555 scores 1,604 and the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 555 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Raw compute: 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,604+2% | 1,575 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 640+344% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4147 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+186% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 555 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 555) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the GeForce GTX 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB+50% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 555) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 555 draws 70W versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 555) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 210mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-7% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 210mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.9+9% | 21.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The GeForce GTX 555 costs 90% less ($270 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 909.4% better value. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-90% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5+909% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GF116 | Venus |
| Release | May 14 2011 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #849 | #746 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















