
GeForce GTX 555
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M370X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 555
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 104.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M370X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon R9 M370X
2015Why buy it
- ✅88.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 555
2011Radeon R9 M370X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 104.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅88.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M370X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.2 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 M370X better than GeForce GTX 555?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 555 make more sense than Radeon R9 M370X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 18 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 555 and Radeon R9 M370X

GeForce GTX 555
GeForce GTX 555
The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R9 M370X
Radeon R9 M370X
The Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 19 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,570 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 555 scores 1,604 and the Radeon R9 M370X reaches 1,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 555 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M370X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 144 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,604+2% | 1,570 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 144 | 640+344% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 555 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M370X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 555 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M370X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M370X offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R9 M370X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 555) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M370X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 555) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R9 M370X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 555 draws 70W versus the Radeon R9 M370X's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 555) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M370X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-7% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 210mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.9+10% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M370X launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 555 costs 50% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.7 (GeForce GTX 555) vs 5.2 (Radeon R9 M370X) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 105.8% better value. The Radeon R9 M370X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 555 | Radeon R9 M370X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.7+106% | 5.2 |
| Codename | GF116 | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 14 2011 | May 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #849 | #758 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












