
GeForce GTX 650 vs GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

GeForce GTX 650
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 650 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 650 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 103.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 650 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+103.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 650 and GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

GeForce GTX 650
The GeForce GTX 650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,756 points. Launch price was $109.

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1085 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 650 scores 1,756 and the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 650 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 650) vs 384 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 650) vs 0.8333 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,756+2% | 1,726 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8125 TFLOPS | 0.8333 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 650 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 650 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (GeForce GTX 650) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (11_0)+9% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 650) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 650) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd Gen | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 650 draws 65W versus the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 650) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 50W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 27.0 | 34.5+28% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 650 launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition launched at $200 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 650 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 70.2 (GeForce GTX 650) vs 34.5 (GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition) — the GeForce GTX 650 offers 103.5% better value. The GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 650 | GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-46% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-50% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 70.2+103% | 34.5 |
| Codename | GK107 | GK107 |
| Release | September 6 2012 | November 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #719 | #925 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















