
GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce 770M

GeForce GTX 680M
Popular choices:

GeForce 770M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 680M is positioned at rank 105 and the GeForce 770M is on rank 57, so the GeForce 770M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 770M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 680M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 770M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680M | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 770M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 23.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680M | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+23.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680M and GeForce 770M

GeForce GTX 680M
The GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 719 MHz to 758 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,277 points. Launch price was $310.50.

GeForce 770M
The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680M scores 3,277 and the GeForce 770M reaches 3,246 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M is built on Kepler while the GeForce 770M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 960 (GeForce 770M). Raw compute: 2.038 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M). Boost clocks: 758 MHz vs 797 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,277 | 3,246 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+40% | 960 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.038 TFLOPS+33% | 1.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 758 MHz | 797 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB+40% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 770M has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 680M offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 384 KB (GeForce 770M) — the GeForce GTX 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 11.1 (GeForce 770M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+8% | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680M) vs NVENC 1 (GeForce 770M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 770M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) | NVENC 1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680M draws 100W versus the GeForce 770M's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 350W (GeForce 770M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 81°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 81°C-5% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 32.8 | 43.3+32% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 770M costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.5 (GeForce GTX 680M) vs 81.2 (GeForce 770M) — the GeForce 770M offers 24% better value. The GeForce 770M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M | GeForce 770M |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.5 | 81.2+24% |
| Codename | GK104 | GK106 |
| Release | June 4 2012 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #561 | #603 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















