GeForce RTX 4070
VS
GeForce 770M

GeForce RTX 4070 vs GeForce 770M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 770M

2013Core: 811 MHzBoost: 797 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070

#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
112%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
111%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
111%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
110%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
109%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
108%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
107%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
107%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
105%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
103%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
103%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
102%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
101%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
101%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
100%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
99%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
99%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
97%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
97%
#58
Arc A380
MSRP: $149|Avg: $119
95%
#59
Radeon RX 9070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
94%
#60
Radeon RX 7900 XT
MSRP: $899|Avg: $630
94%
#61
GeForce RTX 4080
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800
84%
#62
Arc A310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
82%
#63
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
MSRP: $799|Avg: $800
81%
#64
Radeon RX 9070 XT
MSRP: $599|Avg: $700
79%
#65
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
MSRP: $749|Avg: $850
78%
#66
Radeon RX 6900 XT
MSRP: $999|Avg: $385
78%
#67
GeForce GTX 1630
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
75%
#68
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 770M

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
95%
#47
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
201%
#49
182%
#50
181%
#54
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
165%
#55
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
164%
#57
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#62
Radeon 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
99%
#65
97%
#66
97%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 770M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 729.3% higher G3D Mark score and 2300% more VRAM (12 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 770M.

InsightGeForce RTX 4070GeForce 770M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+729.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-729.3%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (304mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 770M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 93% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 65.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce RTX 4070GeForce 770M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+65.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and GeForce 770M

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce 770M

The GeForce 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,246 points. Launch price was $189.99.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the GeForce 770M's 3,246 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 729.3%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce 770M uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 960 (GeForce 770M). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce 770M). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 797 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070GeForce 770M
G3D Mark Score
26,919+729%
3,246
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Kepler
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
5888+513%
960
Compute (TFLOPS)
29.15 TFLOPS+1805%
1.53 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2475 MHz+211%
797 MHz
ROPs
64+167%
24
TMUs
184+130%
80
L1 Cache
5.8 MB+7150%
0.08 MB
L2 Cache
36 MB+9374%
0.38 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce 770M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce 770M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070GeForce 770M
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 770M has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce 770M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070GeForce 770M
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+2300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
504 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
36 MB+9374%
0.38 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 11.1 (GeForce 770M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070GeForce 770M
DirectX
12.2+10%
11.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs NVENC 1 (GeForce 770M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 770M).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070GeForce 770M
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
NVENC 1
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the GeForce 770M's 75W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce 770M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (GeForce 770M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 304mm vs 0mm, occupying 3 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070GeForce 770M
TDP
200W
75W-63%
Recommended PSU
650W
350W-46%
Power Connector
8-pin
Legacy
Length
304mm
0mm
Height
137mm
0mm
Slots
3
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
134.6+211%
43.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 770M costs 92.7% less ($510 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 81.2 (GeForce 770M) — the GeForce 770M offers 66.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4070GeForce 770M
MSRP
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$550
$40-93%
Performance per Dollar
48.9
81.2+66%
Codename
AD104
GK106
Release
April 12 2023
May 30 2013
Ranking
#32
#603