
GeForce GTX 750 vs GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

GeForce GTX 750
Popular choices:

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 750.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 750 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $35), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 17.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 750 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+17.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

GeForce GTX 750
The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.

GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,331 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 750 scores 3,312 and the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 reaches 3,331 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Raw compute: 1.111 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,312 | 3,331 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.111 TFLOPS+85% | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTX 750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3rd Gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 750 draws 55W versus the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2's 106W — a 63.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750) vs 400W (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-48% | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-25% | 400W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 68°C |
| Perf/Watt | 60.2+92% | 31.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 750 launched at $120 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 launched at $129 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 costs 14.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 94.6 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 111.0 (GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2) — the GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 offers 17.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 750 | GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $120-7% | $129 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $30-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.6 | 111.0+17% |
| Codename | GM107 | GF116 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | March 15 2011 |
| Ranking | #559 | #739 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















