GeForce GTX 750
VS
GeForce GTX 675M SLI

GeForce GTX 750 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

2014Core: 1020 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

2011Core: 620 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#556
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3280%
#558
2973%
#559
2966%
#563
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2697%
#564
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2678%
#566
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#567
100%
#568
99%
#569
99%
#570
99%
#571
Radeon R5 M315
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#572
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
MSRP: $599|Avg: $300
98%
#573
GeForce 9400 GT
MSRP: $59|Avg: $20
98%
#574
97%
#575
GeForce 240M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#576
96%
#577
GeForce 310
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
96%
#578
Radeon R5 M320
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#579
96%
#580
GeForce 9600 GT
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
96%
#581
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 675M SLI.

InsightGeForce GTX 750GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 750 and GeForce GTX 675M SLI

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 750

The GeForce GTX 750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,312 points. Launch price was $119.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 675M SLI

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 750 scores 3,312 and the GeForce GTX 675M SLI reaches 3,311 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 750 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 675M SLI uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750GeForce GTX 675M SLI
G3D Mark Score
3,312
3,311
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
768+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 750GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750GeForce GTX 675M SLI
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 750) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750GeForce GTX 675M SLI
DirectX
12_0
12 (11_0)
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3rd Gen (GeForce GTX 750) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 750) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 675M SLI).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Encoder
NVENC 3rd Gen
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 750 draws 55W versus the GeForce GTX 675M SLI's 2W — a 186% difference. The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 750) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M SLI). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 750GeForce GTX 675M SLI
TDP
55W
2W-96%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
1x 6-pin
Length
145mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
92°C
Perf/Watt
60.2
1655.5+2650%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 750 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 750GeForce GTX 675M SLI
MSRP
$120
Avg Price (30d)
$35
Codename
GM107
N12E-GTX2
Release
February 18 2014
January 6 2011
Ranking
#559
#557