
GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

GeForce GTX 860M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 860M is positioned at rank #177 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 860M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 860M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 860M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 860M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 860M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 860M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 860M and GeForce GTX 560 Ti

GeForce GTX 860M
The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 860M scores 3,095 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti reaches 3,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 860M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,095 | 3,080 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 or 640+200% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.389 TFLOPS+10% | 1.263 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 64+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 512 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2.0 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 860M draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-53% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 41.3+114% | 19.3 |
Value Analysis
Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.9 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 61.6 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 860M offers 0.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 860M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 860M | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.9 | 61.6 |
| Codename | GM107 | GF114 |
| Release | January 13 2014 | January 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #578 | #580 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















