GeForce GTX 860M
VS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 860M

2014Core: 797 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

2011Core: 823 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 860M is positioned at rank #177 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 860M

#167
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
351%
#169
318%
#170
317%
#174
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
288%
#175
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
286%
#177
GeForce GTX 860M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
100%
#179
Radeon R9 360
MSRP: $99|Avg: $55
99%
#180
99%
#181
GeForce GTX 460M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
98%
#182
Radeon 6750M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
98%
#183
GeForce GT 525M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
97%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 860M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti.

InsightGeForce GTX 860MGeForce GTX 560 Ti
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 860M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 860M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $50), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 860MGeForce GTX 560 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+0.5%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 860M and GeForce GTX 560 Ti

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 860M

The GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1152 or 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,095 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,080 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 860M scores 3,095 and the GeForce GTX 560 Ti reaches 3,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 860M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 560 Ti uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 1.263 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GTX 860MGeForce GTX 560 Ti
G3D Mark Score
3,095
3,080
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1152 or 640+200%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.389 TFLOPS+10%
1.263 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
64+60%
L1 Cache
320 KB
512 KB+60%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 860MGeForce GTX 560 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 860MGeForce GTX 560 Ti
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 860MGeForce GTX 560 Ti
DirectX
11.0
11_0
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti).

FeatureGeForce GTX 860MGeForce GTX 560 Ti
Encoder
NVENC 2.0
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 860M draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 560 Ti's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 860MGeForce GTX 560 Ti
TDP
75W-53%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
41.3+114%
19.3
💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.9 (GeForce GTX 860M) vs 61.6 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 860M offers 0.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 860M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 860MGeForce GTX 560 Ti
MSRP
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$50
Performance per Dollar
61.9
61.6
Codename
GM107
GF114
Release
January 13 2014
January 25 2011
Ranking
#578
#580