GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce GTX 880M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 880M is positioned at rank #116 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 880M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 880M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 227.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 880M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-227.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+227.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $209 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 135.1% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 880M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+135.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 880M and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GeForce GTX 880M
The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 880M scores 3,826 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 227.6%. The GeForce GTX 880M is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,826 | 12,535+228% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.05 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+198% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 1777 MHz+79% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2.5 MB+1823% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 224 GB/s+40% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 880M draws 122W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 6.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W-6% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 66°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 96.4+207% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 880M costs 28.2% less ($59 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.5 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 135.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-28% | $209 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.5 | 60.0+135% |
| Codename | GK104 | GA106 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #514 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 880M and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
