GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce GTX 880M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 880M is positioned at rank #116 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 880M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 880M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 410.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 880M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-410.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+410.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 156.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 880M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+156.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 880M and GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce GTX 880M
The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 880M scores 3,826 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 410.9%. The GeForce GTX 880M is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 993 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,826 | 19,548+411% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3072+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.05 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+395% |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 2460 MHz+148% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 3 MB+2208% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 24 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 880M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 70% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 272 GB/s+70% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 24 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 880M draws 122W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 5.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 115W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4 | 170.0+441% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 880M costs 49.8% less ($149 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.5 (GeForce GTX 880M) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 156.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 880M | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-50% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.5 | 65.4+156% |
| Codename | GK104 | AD107 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #514 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 880M and GeForce RTX 4060
