
GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs GRID V100D-8Q

GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Popular choices:

GRID V100D-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is positioned at rank 205 and the GRID V100D-8Q is on rank 387, so the GeForce GTX 965M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100D-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID V100D-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 965M SLI.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID V100D-8Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 965M SLI and GRID V100D-8Q

GeForce GTX 965M SLI
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.

GRID V100D-8Q
The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI scores 4,010 and the GRID V100D-8Q reaches 4,156 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is built on Maxwell while the GRID V100D-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 640 (GRID V100D-8Q). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,010 | 4,156+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1306 MHz+37% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit x2 vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit x2+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI draws 75W versus the GRID V100D-8Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 350W (GRID V100D-8Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5+189% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The GRID V100D-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $10000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10000 |
| Codename | — | GM107 |
| Release | January 5 2015 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #370 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















