GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

2015Core: 924 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

2016Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1180 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 460 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 41.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

2016

Why buy it

  • 8.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (4,100 vs 4,010), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 965M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 460 (móvel) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 965M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $86.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI scores 4,010 and the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) reaches 4,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1180 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
4,010
4,100+2%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+129%
896
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1180 MHz+24%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 80.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — a 39.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 460 (móvel). Memory bus width is 128-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 965M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460 (móvel).

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
80.2 GB/s x2
112 GB/s+40%
Bus Width
128-bit x2
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 460 (móvel)'s 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
TDP
75W
55W-27%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
53.5
74.5+39%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 460 (móvel) (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 965M SLIRadeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP
$99
Codename
Baffin
Release
January 5 2015
August 8 2016
Ranking
#370
#499

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.