GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Quadro K5000
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Popular choices:
Quadro K5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is positioned at rank 205 and the Quadro K5000 is on rank 313, so the GeForce GTX 965M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 965M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 965M SLI and Quadro K5000
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.
Quadro K5000
The Quadro K5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 17 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 706 MHz to 706 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,989 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI scores 4,010 and the Quadro K5000 reaches 3,989 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K5000 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 1,536 (Quadro K5000). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 706 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,010 | 3,989 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz+35% | 706 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5000 has 4 GB. The Quadro K5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit x2 vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit x2+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI draws 75W versus the Quadro K5000's 122W — a 47.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro K5000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-39% | 122W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5+64% | 32.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 965M SLI | Quadro K5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $60 |
| Codename | — | GK104 |
| Release | January 5 2015 | August 17 2012 |
| Ranking | #370 | #492 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 965M SLI and Quadro K5000
