GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Radeon RX 460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Radeon RX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 460 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $110 MSRP).

Radeon RX 460

2016

Why buy it

✅12.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 460 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (4,099 vs 4,010), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 965M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 460 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 460 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 965M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 965M SLI

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.

Radeon RX 460

The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI scores 4,010 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M SLI	Radeon RX 460
G3D Mark Score	4,010	4,099+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+129%	896
Boost Clock	950 MHz	1200 MHz+26%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M SLI	Radeon RX 460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 460 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 80.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 460) — a 39.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 460. Memory bus width is 128-bit x2 on the GeForce GTX 965M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M SLI	Radeon RX 460
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	80.2 GB/s x2	112 GB/s+40%
Bus Width	128-bit x2	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 965M SLI draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M SLI	Radeon RX 460
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	None
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	53.5	54.7+2%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 460 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce GTX 965M SLI	Radeon RX 460
MSRP	—	$110
Codename	—	Baffin
Release	January 5 2015	August 8 2016
Ranking	#370	#485

Search GeForce GTX 965M SLI on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.