
GeForce GTX 970

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 2060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 2060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 970
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅63.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 38% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 46.4%. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640 | 14,114+46% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664 | 1920+15% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1680 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 56+17% | 48 |
| TMUs | 104 | 120+15% |
| L1 Cache | 0.61 MB | 1.9 MB+211% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 970 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 970 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 2060. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 970) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 970 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-6% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 72-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3 | 88.2+37% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 970 came in at $329, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 970 was 5.7% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.3 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 37.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 2060 (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-6% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3 | 40.4+38% |
| Codename | GM204 | TU106 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #269 | #168 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















