
GeForce GTX 970

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 970
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌94.7% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅20.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 11.5%. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640 | 10,749+12% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664 | 2304+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1470 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 56+75% | 32 |
| TMUs | 104+44% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 0.61 MB | 2.3 MB+277% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 970 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 970. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 970 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+33% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3 | 153.6+139% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 970 came in at $329, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 48.6% cheaper ($160 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.3 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 117.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $169-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3 | 63.6+117% |
| Codename | GM204 | GA107 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #269 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















