
GeForce GTX 970

GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 970
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 304mm, a 37mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.3 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅161.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 53.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 29.3 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
- ❌13.9% longer card at 304mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 970 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 970
The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 970 scores 9,640 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 179.2%. The GeForce GTX 970 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,640 | 26,919+179% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1664 | 5888+254% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.92 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+644% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2475 MHz+110% |
| ROPs | 56 | 64+14% |
| TMUs | 104 | 184+77% |
| L1 Cache | 0.61 MB | 5.8 MB+851% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 36 MB+1700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 970 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 970 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 970 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 970) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 504 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 36 MB+1700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP6 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 970 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 970) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 64.3 | 134.6+109% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 970 came in at $329, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 970 was 45.1% cheaper ($270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.3 (GeForce GTX 970) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 53.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-45% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.3 | 44.9+53% |
| Codename | GM204 | AD104 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #269 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















