
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

Quadro T1000
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs Quadro T1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs Quadro T1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs Quadro T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
2014Why buy it
- ✅15.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌62% higher power demand at 81W vs 50W.
- ❌71.2% longer card at 267mm vs 156mm.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 81W, a 31W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 267mm, a 111mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs Quadro T1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,707+3% | 6,505 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1455 MHz+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro T1000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and 256-bit on the Quadro T1000.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 47.3% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 81W | 50W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 82.8 | 130.1+57% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $400 |
| Codename | GM204 | TU117 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #408 | #376 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














