GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
VS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014Core: 924 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
VS

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

2023Boost: 1500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is positioned at rank 90 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is on rank 197, so the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
100%
#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
95%
#80
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
243%
#82
220%
#83
220%
#87
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
200%
#88
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
198%
#90
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#92
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
99%
#95
GeForce GT 555M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
97%
#97
GeForce GTX 760M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#100
GeForce 945M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98
94%
#103
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
93%
#105
GeForce GTX 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

#187
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
388%
#189
352%
#190
351%
#194
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
319%
#195
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
317%
#197
100%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
96%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#212
GeForce GTX 780M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%)
Leading raw performance (+4.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Legacy (4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 and the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS reaches 7,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
G3D Mark Score
6,707
7,000+4%
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1280
1536+20%
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1500 MHz+45%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) — a 12.5% advantage for the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
120 GB/s
135 GB/s+13%
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs ES 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6+44%
ES 3.2
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs Adreno VPU. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS).

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Encoder
5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Adreno VPU
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC
Adreno VPU
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS's 40W — a 67.8% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
TDP
81W
40W-51%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
82.8
175.0+111%
💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
MSRP
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$250
Codename
GM204
Release
October 7 2014
October 26 2023
Ranking
#408
#482