
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is positioned at rank #90 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and Radeon RX Vega M GH

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,707+2% | 6,548 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.657 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1190 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+25% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 70.7% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GH. Bus width: 192-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 120 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 1024-bit+433% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 21% difference. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 81W-19% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 82.8+26% | 65.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $0 |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #408 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















