GeForce MX110
VS
FirePro W5130M

GeForce MX110 vs FirePro W5130M

NVIDIA

GeForce MX110

2017Core: 978 MHzBoost: 1006 MHz
VS

FirePro W5130M

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX110 is positioned at rank 315 and the FirePro W5130M is on rank 14, so the FirePro W5130M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX110

#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
99%
#305
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
767%
#307
696%
#308
694%
#312
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
631%
#313
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
627%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
100%
#320
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
98%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
97%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
95%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
95%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W5130M

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
210%
#14
FirePro W5130M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
63%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
56%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX110 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W5130M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce MX110FirePro W5130M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX110 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX110 and FirePro W5130M

NVIDIA

GeForce MX110

The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.

AMD

FirePro W5130M

The FirePro W5130M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 2 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,408 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX110 scores 1,415 and the FirePro W5130M reaches 1,408 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX110 is built on Maxwell while the FirePro W5130M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX110) vs 512 (FirePro W5130M). Raw compute: 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (FirePro W5130M). Boost clocks: 1006 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX110FirePro W5130M
G3D Mark Score
1,415
1,408
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5151 TFLOPS
0.9472 TFLOPS+84%
Boost Clock
1006 MHz+9%
925 MHz
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce MX110FirePro W5130M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce MX110 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W5130M has 4 GB. The FirePro W5130M offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX110) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro W5130M) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce MX110FirePro W5130M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX110 draws 30W versus the FirePro W5130M's 150W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX110) vs 350W (FirePro W5130M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce MX110FirePro W5130M
TDP
30W-80%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
47.2+402%
9.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX110 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce MX110FirePro W5130M
MSRP
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
GM108S
Tropo
Release
November 17 2017
October 2 2015
Ranking
#781
#783