GeForce MX110 vs Radeon R7 M370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX110 vs Radeon R7 M370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX110 vs Radeon R7 M370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX110

2017

Why buy it

✅26.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.2 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M370

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX110 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
30% HIGHER MSRP
$130 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 14.2 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce MX110 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M370 instead at 1,418 vs 1,415, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX110 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX110 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $130, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 29.7% (14.2 vs 10.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX110 vs Radeon R7 M370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX110

The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.

Radeon R7 M370

The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX110 scores 1,415 and the Radeon R7 M370 reaches 1,418 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX110 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 M370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX110) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M370). Raw compute: 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110) vs 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370). Boost clocks: 1006 MHz vs 960 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon R7 M370
G3D Mark Score	1,415	1,418
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	384+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5151 TFLOPS	0.7373 TFLOPS+43%
Boost Clock	1006 MHz+5%	960 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	24+50%
L1 Cache	128 KB+33%	96 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX110 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon R7 M370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX110 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M370. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX110) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M370) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon R7 M370
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	40 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX110 draws 30W versus the Radeon R7 M370's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX110) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M370). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon R7 M370
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	Mobile
Perf/Watt	47.2+150%	18.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX110 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 M370 launched at $130. On MSRP, GeForce MX110 was 23.1% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.2 (GeForce MX110) vs 10.9 (Radeon R7 M370) — the GeForce MX110 offers 30.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX110 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon R7 M370
MSRP	$100-23%	$130
Performance per Dollar	14.2+30%	10.9
Codename	GM108S	Litho
Release	November 17 2017	May 5 2015
Ranking	#781	#778

Search GeForce MX110 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.