GeForce MX110 vs Radeon 550X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX110 vs Radeon 550X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX110 vs Radeon 550X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX110

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 550X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon 550X

2019

Why buy it

✅21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅GeForce MX110 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 550X is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
9% HIGHER MSRP
$109 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 550X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (1,475 vs 1,415), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 550X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX110 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $109, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4.6% (14.2 vs 13.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce MX110 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 550X has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce MX110 vs Radeon 550X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX110

The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.

Radeon 550X

The Radeon 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX110 scores 1,415 and the Radeon 550X reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX110 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX110) vs 512 (Radeon 550X). Raw compute: 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 550X). Boost clocks: 1006 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon 550X
G3D Mark Score	1,415	1,475+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	256	512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5151 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+142%
Boost Clock	1006 MHz	1218 MHz+21%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	32+100%
L1 Cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX110 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 550X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon 550X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX110 and 64-bit on the Radeon 550X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX110) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 550X) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon 550X
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX110 draws 30W versus the Radeon 550X's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX110) vs 350W (Radeon 550X). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon 550X
TDP	30W-40%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	None
Perf/Watt	47.2+60%	29.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX110 came in at $100, while the Radeon 550X launched at $109. On MSRP, GeForce MX110 was 8.3% cheaper ($9 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.2 (GeForce MX110) vs 13.5 (Radeon 550X) — the GeForce MX110 offers 5.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 550X (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce MX110	Radeon 550X
MSRP	$100-8%	$109
Performance per Dollar	14.2+5%	13.5
Codename	GM108S	Lexa
Release	November 17 2017	March 27 2019
Ranking	#781	#772

Search GeForce MX110 on Amazon

Search Radeon 550X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.