
GeForce MX110 vs Radeon 550X

GeForce MX110
Popular choices:

Radeon 550X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX110 is positioned at rank 315 and the Radeon 550X is on rank 101, so the Radeon 550X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX110
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 550X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 550X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 550X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce MX110 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 550X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX110.
| Insight | GeForce MX110 | Radeon 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX110 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $45 for the Radeon 550X, it costs 11% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 7.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX110 | Radeon 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+7.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX110 and Radeon 550X

GeForce MX110
The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.

Radeon 550X
The Radeon 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX110 scores 1,415 and the Radeon 550X reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX110 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX110) vs 512 (Radeon 550X). Raw compute: 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 550X). Boost clocks: 1006 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX110 | Radeon 550X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,415 | 1,475+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 512+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5151 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+142% |
| Boost Clock | 1006 MHz | 1218 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX110 | Radeon 550X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX110) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 550X) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX110 | Radeon 550X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX110 draws 30W versus the Radeon 550X's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX110) vs 350W (Radeon 550X). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | GeForce MX110 | Radeon 550X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Perf/Watt | 47.2+60% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX110 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon 550X launched at $109 and now averages $45. The GeForce MX110 costs 11.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (GeForce MX110) vs 32.8 (Radeon 550X) — the GeForce MX110 offers 7.9% better value. The Radeon 550X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX110 | Radeon 550X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-8% | $109 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-11% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.4+8% | 32.8 |
| Codename | GM108S | Lexa |
| Release | November 17 2017 | March 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #781 | #772 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















