GeForce MX110 vs Tesla M2090

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX110 is positioned at rank 315 and the Tesla M2090 is on rank 379, so the GeForce MX110 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX110

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

99%

#305

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

767%

#307

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

696%

#308

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

694%

#312

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

631%

#313

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

627%

#315

GeForce MX110

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

100%

#320

GeForce 940A

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

98%

#323

Radeon RX 640

MSRP: $159|Avg: $55

97%

#326

Iris Pro Graphics P580

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

95%

#327

Radeon E8870PCIe

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

95%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2090

#363

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

26380%

#378

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

100%

#379

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

100%

#380

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

95%

#381

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

95%

#382

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

84%

#383

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

79%

#384

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

77%

#385

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

77%

#386

GRID V100D-8Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000

75%

#387

Tesla M2070

MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50

75%

#388

GRID M10-0Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

71%

#389

Quadro FX 560

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

68%

#390

GRID V100-2Q

MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000

68%

#391

Quadro FX 5800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40

62%

#392

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565

57%

#393

FireStream 9170

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20

57%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce MX110 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The GeForce MX110 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M2090 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX110 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2090.

Insight	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	Standard Size (248mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce MX110 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce MX110 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+1.1%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX110 Benchmark Check

Tesla M2090 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX110 and Tesla M2090

GeForce MX110

The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX110 scores 1,415 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX110 is built on Maxwell while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX110) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score	1,415+1%	1,400
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	256	512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5151 TFLOPS	1.332 TFLOPS+159%
ROPs	8	48+500%
TMUs	16	64+300%
L1 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX110) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX110 draws 30W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX110) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
TDP	30W-88%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	248mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	47.2+743%	5.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX110 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.4 (GeForce MX110) vs 35.0 (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce MX110 offers 1.1% better value. The GeForce MX110 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).