GeForce MX110 vs Tesla M2090

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX110 vs Tesla M2090 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX110 vs Tesla M2090: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX110

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2426.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla M2090

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2400% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 14.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce MX110 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (1,415 vs 1,400), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX110 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX110 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,400 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2426.8% (14.2 vs 0.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce MX110 vs Tesla M2090 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX110

The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.

Tesla M2090

The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX110 scores 1,415 and the Tesla M2090 reaches 1,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX110 is built on Maxwell while the Tesla M2090 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX110) vs 512 (Tesla M2090). Raw compute: 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110) vs 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090).

Feature	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
G3D Mark Score	1,415+1%	1,400
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	256	512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5151 TFLOPS	1.332 TFLOPS+159%
ROPs	8	48+500%
TMUs	16	64+300%
L1 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX110 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M2090 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX110 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2090. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce MX110) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+33%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX110 draws 30W versus the Tesla M2090's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX110) vs 350W (Tesla M2090). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
TDP	30W-88%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	248mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	47.2+743%	5.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX110 came in at $100, while the Tesla M2090 launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce MX110 was 96% cheaper ($2400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.2 (GeForce MX110) vs 0.6 (Tesla M2090) — the GeForce MX110 offers 2266.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX110 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce MX110	Tesla M2090
MSRP	$100-96%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	14.2+2267%	0.6
Codename	GM108S	GF110
Release	November 17 2017	July 25 2011
Ranking	#781	#530

Search GeForce MX110 on Amazon

Search Tesla M2090 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.