
GeForce MX230 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

GeForce MX230
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 560 SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX230 is positioned at rank #338 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX230
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX230 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce MX230 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 560 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce MX230 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce MX230 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce MX230.
| Insight | GeForce MX230 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX230 and GeForce GTX 560 SE

GeForce MX230
The GeForce MX230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1519 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,826 points.

GeForce GTX 560 SE
The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX230 scores 1,826 and the GeForce GTX 560 SE reaches 1,847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX230 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 560 SE uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce MX230) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Raw compute: 0.81 TFLOPS (GeForce MX230) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE).
| Feature | GeForce MX230 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,826 | 1,847+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 288+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.81 TFLOPS | 0.8479 TFLOPS+5% |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 16 | 48+200% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 384 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX230 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX230 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce MX230 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce MX230) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the GeForce MX230 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX230 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 48 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX230 draws 10W versus the GeForce GTX 560 SE's 150W — a 175% difference. The GeForce MX230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX230) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX230 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 10W-93% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 210mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 182.6+1385% | 12.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX230 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 and now averages $150. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.2 (GeForce MX230) vs 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 0.8% better value. The GeForce MX230 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce MX230 | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.2 | 12.3 |
| Codename | GP108 | GF114 |
| Release | February 21 2019 | February 20 2012 |
| Ranking | #708 | #706 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















