GeForce PCX 5750 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce PCX 5750
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce PCX 5750 is positioned at rank #366 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce PCX 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 57934.3% higher G3D Mark score and 6300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce PCX 5750.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-57934.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+57934.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3009% better value per dollar than the GeForce PCX 5750.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3009%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce PCX 5750 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce PCX 5750 scores 35 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 57934.3%. The GeForce PCX 5750 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35 | 20,312+57934% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 4864+913% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+1053% |
| ROPs | 40 | 80+100% |
| TMUs | 60 | 152+153% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 4.8 MB+411% |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 4 MB+535% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce PCX 5750 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 6300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 8 GB+6300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.63 MB | 4 MB+535% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+33% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 4.6+207% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce PCX 5750) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: None vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | None | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5750 draws 219W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 9.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 200W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 242mm |
| Height | 100mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 101.6+50700% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The GeForce PCX 5750 costs 94.6% less ($265 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 3052.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-62% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-95% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3 | 72.5+3052% |
| Codename | GF110 | GA104 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #497 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce PCX 5750 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
