
GeForce PCX 5900
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5900ZT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce PCX 5900 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5900ZT.
| Insight | GeForce PCX 5900 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce PCX 5900 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce PCX 5900 and GeForce FX 5900ZT

GeForce PCX 5900
The GeForce PCX 5900 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce FX 5900ZT
The GeForce FX 5900ZT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce PCX 5900 scores 34 and the GeForce FX 5900ZT reaches 33 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce PCX 5900 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce FX 5900ZT uses Rankine, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900ZT). Raw compute: 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900ZT).
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34+3% | 33 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 ×2 | 1024 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 48 ×2 |
| TMUs | 64 ×2 | 64 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce PCX 5900 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5900ZT has 128 MB. The GeForce PCX 5900 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce PCX 5900 draws 365W versus the GeForce FX 5900ZT's 365W — a 0% difference. The GeForce FX 5900ZT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce PCX 5900) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900ZT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 365W | 365W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 218mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce PCX 5900 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce FX 5900ZT launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce PCX 5900) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5900ZT) — the GeForce FX 5900ZT offers NaN% better value.
| Feature | GeForce PCX 5900 | GeForce FX 5900ZT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | GF110 | GF110 |
| Release | March 24 2011 | March 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #555 | #555 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















