GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
VS
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

2019Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1095 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
127%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
126%
#39
Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP: $449|Avg: $350
108%
#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
102%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#44
100%
#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.

InsightGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER reaches 12,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
G3D Mark Score
12,766
12,692
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2944+109%
1408
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.447 TFLOPS+28%
5.027 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1095 MHz
1785 MHz+63%
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
184+109%
88
L1 Cache
2.9 MB+107%
1.4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+33%
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s+14%
336 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+167%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Encoder
NVENC 6
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
NVDEC 4
NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 125W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
TDP
80W-36%
125W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
450W
Power Connector
None
8-pin
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
80
75-6%
Perf/Watt
159.6+57%
101.5