
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER reaches 12,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,766 | 12,692 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+109% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.447 TFLOPS+28% | 5.027 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1095 MHz | 1785 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+109% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+107% | 1.4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s+14% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 125W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-36% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 159.6+57% | 101.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














